
The State of the Curaçao Gambling License: Reform, Stagnation, and Loss of Credibility
This report examines what has been happening with the Curaçao gambling license over the past three years — and why the situation matters far beyond Curaçao itself.
Nearly three years ago, the Curaçao authorities announced a fundamental reform of the gambling regulatory regime. At the time, the changes were presented as decisive and structural. Since then, however, the system has remained in a prolonged state of turbulence, characterized less by transformation than by uncertainty.
The Original Promise of Reform
In January 2023, Curaçao formally declared its intention to overhaul the gambling framework. The stated goals were ambitious and, on paper, aligned with international standards.
- dismantling the master license and sub-license regime;
- introducing direct licensing;
- increasing annual licensing fees;
- centralizing oversight under a single regulator;
- improving transparency and compliance;
- establishing responsible gambling and exclusion mechanisms.
To support this transition, the Curaçao Gambling Authority was created, replacing the fragmented system of multiple supervisory bodies.
What Actually Happened: A Regime of Extensions
In practice, the reform never reached completion. Instead, it entered a cycle of provisional measures and repeated extensions.
- August 2023: the existing master license regime was extended for one year.
- December 2024–2025: the provisional licensing framework was extended again, this time until December 2025.
- A National Ordinance formally established the new authority, but without delivering operational clarity.
By the time these extensions were announced, many operators, regulators, and financial institutions had already begun looking for alternatives.
The Transparency That Never Arrived
Transparency was one of the central pillars of the reform. This was symbolized by the introduction of license seals, intended to mirror the Maltese model.
The concept was straightforward:
- remove legacy “orange” seals;
- retain only “green” seals;
- ensure that each seal links to a public license verification page.
By late 2025, the outcome was the opposite of the stated goal.
- operators displayed mixed seals of different colors;
- many verification links were broken or led nowhere;
- license status could not be reliably confirmed.
Institutional Instability and Erosion of Trust
Beyond technical inconsistencies, the reform suffered from institutional instability.
- The advisory board of the new authority resigned and was not reconstituted.
- The Financial Supervision Board confirmed that the Public Prosecutor’s Office was investigating the gambling authority.
- Long-standing rumors of licensing irregularities resurfaced.
- Official denials followed, but were contradictory and inconclusive.
Why It Still Matters: The Economic Stake
Despite reputational damage, the Curaçao license remains relevant for one key reason: scale.
The current cost structure typically includes:
- approximately €4,000 application fee;
- around €12,000 annual license fee;
- €150–200 per month for each operational URL.
For most operators, this results in annual costs exceeding €15,000 per casino.
New Jurisdictions Filling the Vacuum
As Curaçao’s credibility weakened, alternative jurisdictions moved in to capture displaced demand.
Costa Rica
Costa Rica did not introduce formal gambling regulation. Instead, it focused on the true bottleneck of the industry: banking and payments.
Its permissive crypto environment allows operators to:
- register companies;
- open bank accounts;
- accept crypto payments from players;
- convert those funds into fiat locally.
While lacking direct EU or US linkage, offshore structures often bridge this gap in practice.
Anjouan (Comoros Islands)
Anjouan positioned itself as a licensing authority and reportedly attracted hundreds of operators.
Malta’s Shadow Role
Malta remains one of the most established gambling regulators globally. While no direct evidence of coordination exists, the pattern of media coverage is notable.
Negative Curaçao developments were consistently amplified through Malta-based outlets, suggesting strategic interest — though such conclusions remain interpretative.
The Anjouan Scandal: A Familiar Pattern
Ironically, the most serious challenge to Curaçao’s former dominance came from Anjouan itself.
In early January, investigative reporting revealed that the private entity issuing Anjouan licenses may not have been legally empowered to do so.
As a result, Anjouan-issued licenses are now under scrutiny and may ultimately be deemed invalid.
Conclusion
The Curaçao gambling reform was ambitious in intent, but unsuccessful in execution.
- The old system was never fully dismantled.
- The new system never fully stabilized.
- Transparency remained inconsistent.
- Institutional trust eroded.
- Competitors captured market share.
Until enforcement, clarity, and institutional trust are restored, the Curaçao license will remain a transitional instrument in an increasingly fragmented and skeptical global gambling ecosystem.